Wharton v. Christie

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beasley, Chief Justice.

My examination of this case lhas resulted in the conviction that the judgment before us ••should be reversed.

The facts necessary to explain the view thus taken are' briefly these:

■ The defendant in error, Christie, was in the employment of Wharton, the plaintiff in error, and this suit is brought by the former for the wages stipulated for in the contract creating •such relation, the ground of action being that he had been unlawfully discharged from the employment, and that consequently he had a right to such agreed wages.

■ The…