Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kansas, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Pruitt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 7, 1942No. 30246Published

1ConcurrenceBayless, J.

(concurring in result). 1 am authorized to say that Justices RILEY, HURST, and ARNOLD concur in the views which I express with respect to the issue covered in syllabus No. 2 of the opinion of the court. I concur in the result reached,. but upon a different theory.

The first proposition argued in this appeal relates to the failure of the plaintiff to prove that no administrator has been appointed, as a condition to the right of the widow to maintain the action. 12 O. S. 1941 §§ 1053-1054. This argument is based on several Oklahoma decisions holding that it must be alleged and proved that no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad Company, Appt. v. Wirt AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Walker v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  3. Dolese Bros. v. TollettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Oklahoma City v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Vaughn v. Kansas City Northwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API