Legal Opinion

Kansas City, M. O. Ry. Co. of v. Foster

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 15, 1931No. 3586PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.

The appellee sued the Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Company of Texas, and the Panhandle & Santa Fé Railway Company, jointly to recover damages for personal' injuries, alleging that the defendants had been negligent: (a) In requiring him to handle switch ties without a sufficient number of men to assist him, and (b) in permitting a switch block to be left where he could and did stumble over it in handling such ties. "

The defendants’ answer consisted of a general denial and a special answer that appel-lee was in the employ of the Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Company, and not of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. ClausenIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co. v. ParryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Lamar v. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. MathisTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Eastern Texas Electric Co. v. BakerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Compton v. JayTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. CurryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Transport Insurance Company v. CossaboonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. McEwen v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Roy v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API