Howard v. Aetna Life Insurance
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtJoyce, J.
This is a motion by the defendant for summary judgment, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
It seems defendant issued a policy of life insurance on the life of Antanas Bulavas, wherein the plaintiff was the beneficiary. The assured died on May 29,1944, shortly after having partaken of a certain liquor as a beverage which thereafter was found to have contained methyl alcohol, a poison. Defendant paid the face amount of the policy.
Plaintiff now sues to recover a like amount, claiming the -death of the assured came within the terms and provisions of the double indemnity clause of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rasmussen v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Osburn v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Diamond v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Pixley v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Feldstein v. New York Life Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.