Frank v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF ROADS

On motion for rehearing plaintiff condemnees attack the finding in our opinion that there was competent evidence to sustain the special finding of the jury that there was no damage to the remainder property of the plaintiffs. Further, they specifically attack those portions of the opinion which state that the jury could have found that any remainder damage was counterbalanced by an increase in value as the result of the taking, and that if the effect of the taking was to increase the value of the remainder, that the condemner was entitled to introduce valuation testimony from which such…