Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 28, 1936No. 3 Div. 180PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

Under a long line of decisions by this court, while an accused may be permitted to show that another committed the offense, that cannot be done by proving a confession or statement by another that he committed the offense with which the accused is charged. Such evidence is but hearsay. West v. State, 76 Ala. 98; Snow v. State, 58 Ala. 372; Welsh v. State, 96 Ala. 92, 11 So. 450; McDonald v. State, 165 Ala. 85, 51 So. 629; Donnelly v. United States, 228 U.S. 243, 33 S.Ct. 449, 57 L.Ed. 820, Ann.Cas.1913E, 710.

The case of Spicer v. State, 188 Ala. 9, 65 So. 972, 979, is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Spicer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. United States v. BrunettDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1931
  5. Snow v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McBryar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  2. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Garrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Kennard v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API