Legal Opinion

Clark v. Icicle Irrigation District

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1967No. 38899PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

On February 27, 1965, the bank of an irrigation ditch, owned and maintained by the defendant, had broken or washed out, sending a large volume of water and mud approximately a hundred yards down a steep hill and against and through the house in which Grayson Clark, Jr., his wife, and their 20-month-old son were sleeping. Clark and his wife escaped with their lives. The child was killed; the room he occupied being filled almost to the ceiling with mud, dirt and debris. Even trees in the path of the mud and water had been carried down the hill and into the house.

The Clarks brought this action…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wycko v. GnodtkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Pederson v. DumouchelWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Lockhart v. BeselWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Kemalyan v. HendersonWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Sherman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bullard v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Brizendine v. Nampa Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Raymond A. Shaw and Karen L. Shaw, Husband and Wife, Individually, and as Guardians Ad Litem of Richard Scott Shaw, a Minor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Hinzman v. PalmanteerWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Roth v. BellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API