McGuire v. Edsall
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from Ninth Judicial District, Gallatin County. Judgment was rendered by Armstrong, J., for plaintiff, less a counterclaim.
1Per curiam
The sole question involved in this case is whether the trial court erred in permitting defendants, by amendment of their answer, to plead a counterclaim against the demand of plaintiff, which counterclaim matured after *360plaintiff’s action wa3 commenced. The court allowed such amendment during the trial, and permitted evidence to be submitted in support of the counterclaim thus introduced into the action. • This practice cannot be sustained. Our statute provides upon this subject that the defendant, by answer, may plead a counterclaim" as new matter constituting a defense (Code Civ. Proc., §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lyon v. PettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Lebcher v. Board of CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1890
- Smith v. Washington Gaslight Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
- Jeffreys v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Scott v. WaggonerMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Hammond v. ThompsonMontana Supreme Court · 1918
- Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. Sheridan Proctor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Lappin v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- Sturtevant v. DowsonOregon Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.