Legal Opinion

McGuire v. Edsall

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Ninth Judicial District, Gallatin County. Judgment was rendered by Armstrong, J., for plaintiff, less a counterclaim.

1Per curiam

The sole question involved in this case is whether the trial court erred in permitting defendants, by amendment of their answer, to plead a counterclaim against the demand of plaintiff, which counterclaim matured after *360plaintiff’s action wa3 commenced. The court allowed such amendment during the trial, and permitted evidence to be submitted in support of the counterclaim thus introduced into the action. • This practice cannot be sustained. Our statute provides upon this subject that the defendant, by answer, may plead a counterclaim" as new matter constituting a defense (Code Civ. Proc., §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lyon v. PettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Lebcher v. Board of CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Smith v. Washington Gaslight Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  4. Jeffreys v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Scott v. WaggonerMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Hammond v. ThompsonMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Rauer's Law & Collection Co. v. Sheridan Proctor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Lappin v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Sturtevant v. DowsonOregon Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API