Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1994No. CC C90-11-36757; CA A70340; SC S40291Published

1Opinion of the Court

879 P.2d 1272 (1994)

320 Or. 111

STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on Review,

v.

Debra Lynn ARNOLD, Respondent on Review.

CC C90-11-36757; CA A70340; SC S40291.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Argued and Submitted January 7, 1994.

Decided September 15, 1994.

Brenda JP Rocklin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With her on the petition were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Douglas F. Zier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Susan Elizabeth Reese, of Reese & Goffredi, Portland, argued the cause and filed the response for respondent on review.

VAN…

Also in this document: Dissent · Fadeley; Dissent · Durham.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Oberg v. Honda Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API