Legal Opinion
Noonan v. Richardson
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 21, 1972No. Civ. A. 71-144PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOURLEY, Senior District Judge:
This Complaint has been filed to obtain review of a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare denying plaintiff disability benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. A. § 405(g). The immediate matter before the Court is defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
The decision of the Secretary must be affirmed if substantial evidence exists to support the denial of disability benefits. Gentile v. Finch, 423 F.2d 244 (3d Cir. 1970). Substantial evidence exists whenever there is relevant evidence which a reasonable mind can accept…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ann M. Boyd v. Marion B. Folsom, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Leo J. Domozik v. Wilbur J. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- William Gentile v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Temple v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Borg v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974