Legal Opinion
Roy Daniel v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 12, 2014No. 12-5327PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge GARLAND.
GARLAND, Chief Judge:
The plaintiffs in this case are prisoners who violated District of Columbia criminal laws before March 3, 1985. They contend that the United States Parole Commission contravened the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution by retroactively applying parole guidelines that it issued in 2000, instead of applying the guidelines that were in place at the time of their offenses. The district court dismissed their complaint for failure to state a claim. Because the plaintiffs have plausibly alleged that the application of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Peugh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Garner v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Johnson v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Ari Bailey v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Does v. Lawrence WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Artie Dufur v. USPCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
- Wilfred Holmes v. Christopher ChristieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.