Kelley v. Vaughn
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SACHS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, who is currently confined at the Tipton Treatment Center in Tipton, Missouri, has filed pro se a civil rights action under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976), seeking' relief for certain claimed violations of his federally protected rights. Although plaintiff did not submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and did not provide an affidavit of poverty, he did include an official accounting of his inmate account and he did state in his signed complaint that he has “no funds.” Complaint, p. 5. The Court will construe this information to mean that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Evans v. CroomCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Roy Stewart, Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Paul MacIasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Margaret A. Padula v. William Webster, Director, F.B.ICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Sylvester H. Peck v. Cliff Hoff, Deputy Warden, Classification BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- King v. DingleDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010