Lee v. Sioux Falls Motor Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT'S; J.
Respondent commenced! this action against the appellant toi recover damages for alleged misrepresentations as to the condition of a truck purchased by him from the appellant company. Respondent recovered a verdict against the appellant in the sum of $135 and subsequently judgment 'was entered thereon which with costs amounted to $181.95. On February 25, 1935, Homer L- 'Caplan recovered a judgment against respondent, Lee, in the sum of $201.50. On June 7, 1935, and immediately after the rendition of the verdict in the instant case, appellant procured an assignment of the judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dunkin v. VandenberghNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
- Hroch v. Aultman & Taylor Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- Whitehead v. JessupColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
- Pirie v. HarknessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Lindsay v. PettigrewSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kroeplin Farms General Partnership v. Heartland Crop Insurance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Dalton State Bank v. EckertNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Kroeplin Farms v. Heartland Crop Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Lebovits v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021