Legal Opinion

Lee v. Sioux Falls Motor Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1937No. File No. 8017PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT'S; J.

Respondent commenced! this action against the appellant toi recover damages for alleged misrepresentations as to the condition of a truck purchased by him from the appellant company. Respondent recovered a verdict against the appellant in the sum of $135 and subsequently judgment 'was entered thereon which with costs amounted to $181.95. On February 25, 1935, Homer L- 'Caplan recovered a judgment against respondent, Lee, in the sum of $201.50. On June 7, 1935, and immediately after the rendition of the verdict in the instant case, appellant procured an assignment of the judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dunkin v. VandenberghNew York Court of Chancery · 1829
  2. Hroch v. Aultman & Taylor Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Whitehead v. JessupColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Pirie v. HarknessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Lindsay v. PettigrewSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kroeplin Farms General Partnership v. Heartland Crop Insurance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. Dalton State Bank v. EckertNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Kroeplin Farms v. Heartland Crop Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Lebovits v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API