Keelips v. St. Laurent

The plaintiff/appellant Robert Keelips appeals from the allowance of defendant/appellee Mark St. Laurent’s motion for summary judgment.

This case involves Keelips’ contention that St. Laurent committed a violation of G.L.c. 93A in connection with the pricing of a new roof for Keelips’ barn. Keelips asserts that St. Laurent told him that the price would be $43,500 at $300 per square, but did not disclose the number of squares that were involved. After the work was completed, Keelips learned that his roof had 87 squares to it. He claims that at $300 per square, the price should have been…