Legal Opinion
People v. Muldrow
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 16, 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress evidence seized *815during a search of his apartment. Defendant lacks standing to challenge the entry by police officers into the common hallway area accessible to all tenants and their invitees (see, People v Bilsky, 261 AD2d 174, lv dismissed 94 NY2d 859; Mauceri v County of Suffolk, 234 AD2d 350). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the court properly determined that the police officers did not approach defendant’s brother with their handguns drawn and that defendant’s brother…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. BilskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Mauceri v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. BellamyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Ralph M. v. Nancy M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. BarfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. PucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. IddingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.