Commonwealth v. Easton
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, President Judge:
This is an appeal from an order denying relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act. 42 Pa.C.S. § 9541 et seq. Appellant argues that the court reviewing the PCHA petition erred in refusing to hold an evidentiary hearing as this court ordered. We agree, and therefore reverse and remand for hearing.1
Appellant’s first PCHA and appellate counsel was granted leave to withdraw as counsel. Appellant’s second PCHA counsel then filed a petition in this court requesting that we remand for an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s claim that first PCHA and appellate counsel was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PettusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. RombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. Tick, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Haefele v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005