Legal Opinion

Ford v. Farmers' Exchange

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

FROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from the Law Court of Johnson City.— Dana Harmon, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

This suit was begun by Ford to recover damages 'for the breach of an alleged warranty made by defendant in the sale of watermelon seed.

It appears that plaintiff has for many years been engaged in raising melons for market on a large scale. There was testimony tending to show that defendant had. sold plaintiff his melon seed for several years, the seed being known as “Klekley Sweets,” and, knowing of the use intended to be made of them, guaranteed that the seed sold on the particular occasion, which were to come from a new and untried producer, were of that variety. The melons produced from…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. White v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Edgar v. Joseph Breck & Sons Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  3. Vaughan's Seed Store v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. Van Wyck v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Fuhrman v. Interior Warehouse Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. E. P. Moorhead v. Minneapolis Seed Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Sullivan and Cole v. Bandy and GrayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
  3. Lundquist v. JennisonMontana Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API