Legal Opinion

People v. Ney

Ithaca City Court

Decided April 10, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*186OPINION OF THE COURT

Judith A. Rossiter, J.

The defendant, Kelly A. Ney, is charged with violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1129 (a), following too closely, on the 900 block of West Seneca Street, on October 18, 2001. The defendant was charged by a simplified information (uniform traffic ticket or UTT). The back of the ticket contains the following notice to the defendant:

“PART ‘B’ PLEA OF NOT GUILTY
“notice: you are entitled to receive a supporting

DEPOSITION FURTHER EXPLAINING THE CHARGES PROVIDED YOU REQUEST SUCH SUPPORTING DEPOSITION WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE YOU ARE DIRECTED TO…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Duell v. CondonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. NuccioNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Brothers v. FlorenceNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Matter of OnBank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ScherbnerJustice Court of Village of Muttontown · 2008
  2. People v. HillOneida City Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API