Legal Opinion

Frazer v. Couthy Land Co.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided December 6, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The original agreement between the complainant and his father by the terms of which the conveyance *70was to be made to serve only as a security for the repayment of the loan, was in parol. No time limit was fixed in that agreement within which the complainant was to repay the loan or forfeit his rights. The subsequent agreement of May 27, 1924, between the complainant and the defendant was in writing and fixed a three year period as the limit of the complainant’s right to a reconveyance. The extension of time granted by the father, whose authority to act in that regard in behalf…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mooney v. . ByrneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Hall v. LivingstonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1869
  3. Rentoul v. SweeneyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1927
  4. Pierson v. PiersonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1874
  5. Sadowski v. RykaczewskiCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Maisano v. SauerwineCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API