Legal Opinion
Gregory v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided December 11, 1996No. Civil 93-23443-H/VPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HORTON, District Judge.
This action by Plaintiffs charges the Defendant with breaching two important provisions of a contract to purchase a waste disposal site near Emelle, Alabama. The two provisions allegedly violated are the quarterly payment provision, paragraph 2.1 of the contract, and paragraph 6.11, the maximization provision. Additionally, Plaintiffs also charge the Defendant with fraud, willful misrepresentation and suppression of material facts and bad faith refusal to comply with the terms and conditions of the contract. Defendant vehemently denied that it breached…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Garrett v. Raytheon Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. ALA. DEPT. OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCESSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. PER AARSLEFF A/SDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2008
- Advance Trust & Life Escrow Services, LTA v. Protective Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
- Hunt Petroleum Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Hunt Petroleum Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.