Legal Opinion · Dissent

G.W.H. v. D.A.H.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1983No. B3016Published

1DissentMurphy, Justice

I respectfully, but vigorously, dissent. Each element justifying termination of the parent-child relationship under § 15.-02(1)(E) of the Family Code (Vernon Supp.1982) is a fact question. Evidence of both elements is necessary to support a termination. See Wiley v. Spratlan, 543 S.W.2d 349, 350 (Tex.1976); Whiteside v. Dresser, 543 S.W.2d 158 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1976, writ ref’d n.r.e.

DAH amended her petition eight days before trial and changed the alleged statutory ground of termination from failure to support for one year under § 15.02(1)(F) to the endangerment ground under (1)(E). For…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API