Legal Opinion
Rubin v. Midlinsky
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 16, 1928No. Nos. 3881-8888PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAGE, Circuit Judge.
Appellant’s estate
is in bankruptcy, and these appeals are to reverse orders allowing the claim of each appellee. Some questions in this bankruptcy proceeding were before this court in Re Rubin, 1 F.(2d) 157, and that opinion throws some light on Rubin’s methods of doing business.
No. 3881. Sam MiMmsky Claim. — This claim was filed on November 20, 1924, on a judgment in a state court rendered January 31,1917. Bankrupt’s objections thereto were filed April 2, 1925, and set out: (a) That the only basis for the judgment was a note given for the sole purpose of enabling…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bank of Eau Claire v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Smith v. StevensIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Rubin v. BalabanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
3Cited by10 opinions
- Heiser v. WoodruffSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- In Re: Xyz Options, Inc., Debtor. Donald Dionne, as Trustee of the Estate of Xyz Options, Inc. v. W. Leo Keating, in Re: Xyz Options, Inc., Debtor. Donald Dionne, as Trustee of the Estate of Xyz Options, Inc. v. Scott M. Spangler, Jean G. Spangler, the Scott M. Spangler Charitable TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- WOODMAR REALTY COMPANY v. McLEANCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Woodmar Realty Co. v. McLeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- In Re MunsieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.