Legal Opinion
In Re Munsie
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 3, 1929No. 334PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as,above). This is a most anomalous proceeding. It has resulted in the paradoxical situation of a debtor complaining because his creditor asserted too small a claim, and the creditor appealing from an order which allows more than was asked in her proof of elaim. The purpose of the bankrupt’s application was to compel the creditor to include in her proof of elaim all future installments of the monthly deficiency between rent payable under the bankrupt’s lease and that payable by the new tenant, upon the notion, apparently, that if such installments were held provable…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Lesser v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- In re LewensohnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- Gregg Grain Co. v. Walker Grain Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- In re HavensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- American Anthracite & Bituminous Coal Corp. v. Leonardo Arrivabene, S.A., Tramp Tankers Corporation of Liberia and Estate of Hector C. DracoulisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- In Re Jayrose Millinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- In Re SerigneseDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1963
- In Re SetzlerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
- Avco Finance Co. v. EricksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.