Legal Opinion

Hume v. Commercial Bank

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court at Knoxville. W. B. Staley, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.

By the act of 1870, oh. 96, Hugh L. McClung, R. M. McClung, John Williams and R. R. Swepson, were created a body politic and corporate under the name and style of the Commercial Bank of Knoxville, subject to all the restrictions and penalties, and entitled to all the benefits and privileges of the charter creating the Knoxville Bank, passed March 25, 1866. The Knoxville Bank charter provides that the capital stock shall not exceed $100,000, and that the corporation shall be subject to such general laws • as the Legislature may pass in reference to banks and other similar institutions. By the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. LudelingSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Arthur v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Paul v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1872
  4. Ogden v. RolloNew York Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Company v. Henry Clingan and Linda ClinganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  2. McClure v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
  3. Franklin v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1945
  4. Smith v. MurrayTennessee Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API