Legal Opinion
Serrano v. Rotman
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 4, 2011No. 1-09-2028PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE FITZGERALD SMITH
delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion.
Justices Howse and Epstein 1 concurred in the judgment and opinion.
OPINION
This medical malpractice claim arose following complications from reverse tubal ligation surgery. Migdalia Serrano (plaintiff) alleged that Dr. Carlos Rotman was negligent in his care and treatment and that such negligence was a proximate cause of her injury. A jury found in favor of Dr. Rotman. Plaintiff now appeals, alleging that (1) the trial court’s ruling in regard to Dr. Rotman’s Illinois Supreme Court Rule 216 (Ill. S. Ct. R. 216…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Maple v. GustafsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. CaffeyIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Schultz v. NORTHEAST ILL. REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORP.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- York v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. OlingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Crittenden v. Cook County Commission on Human RightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Carlson v. FishAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- GUSKI v. RajaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Kovak v. BarronAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- North Shore Community Bank & Trust Co. v. Sheffield Wellington, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.