Jessen v. Jessen
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
URBIGKIT, Chief Justice.
After the child support payments were brought current pursuant to our prior decision and order in this appeal, Jessen v. Jessen, 802 P.2d 901 (Wyo.1990) (Jessen I), we now examine the validity for Jessen II of a child support late payment provision entered into by the parties. We reverse.
INTRODUCTION
Presented is the validity of a post-divorce decree stipulated modification entered into by appellant, Kent Jessen (husband) and appellee, Tina Jessen (wife), which requires husband to make very substantial “late charge” payments to wife in the event husband continues to be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- X.L.O. Concrete Corp. v. John T. Brady & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Connors v. ConnorsWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Dave Gustafson & Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- X.L.O. Concrete Corp. v. Brady & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Willner v. WillnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- G.C.I., Inc. v. HaughtWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Kelly v. MarxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Morehead v. MoreheadWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Wolin v. WalkerWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Gordonsville Energy, L.P. v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Richmond County Circuit Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.