Legal Opinion

Cottonwood Duplexes v. Barlow

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 2012No. C069564PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBIE, Acting P. J.

In this quiet title action, the trial court narrowed and shortened a road and utility easement that a predecessor of plaintiff Cottonwood Duplexes, LLC (Cottonwood), had granted to defendant Seth Barlow because, in the court’s view, “the reasonable use requirements of [Barlow’s property] both presently and in the future do not require the full size and scope of the [original] easement.”

On appeal, Barlow asserts that no “recognized rule of law . . . authorized [the trial court] to terminate [his] property rights” by reducing the size of his easement against his will,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Smith v. WornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Scruby v. Vintage Grapevine, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Kellogg v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Baccouche v. BlankenshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vieira Enterprises, Inc. v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Porter v. Board of Retirement of the Orange County Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Soroush-Azar v. Palmer CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API