Legal Opinion

Reeves Tractor & Implement Co. v. Barrow

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 25, 1923No. 13964PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

Beeves Tractor & Implement Company brought a suit against Boyce Barrow, for the recovery of $931’.51 principal, besides interest and 10 per cent, for attorney’s fees, upon two promissory notes-for $500 each, containing the following stipulation: “This obligation is given for purchase money of the following described property: one Hart-Parr '30’ Tractor Ho. 18030, one McKay Plow No. P. L. 130, one Oliver Engine Harrow 18 x 32 disc, the title to which remains in the payee hereof until this note with interest and attorney’s fees are paid in full. This obligation is absolute and binding on me,…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Widincamp v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Colson & Sons v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Frick Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Carl S. Strickland Co. v. Union Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Hodge Residential, Inc. v. BANKERS FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API