Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul L. Wayman, Paul Howard Noe Alias H. P. Knowles, Robert L. Hutcheson, Andvictor M. Moore, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1975No. 73--3664PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTLE, District Judge:

On a fifty-three count indictment, alleging violations of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy to violate federal law), § 1341 (mail fraud), § 1343 (fraud by wire), and § 2314 (fraudulent inducement of interstate travel), the jury returned verdicts of guilty on various counts against appellants, Paul L. Wayman, Paul Howard Noe, Robert L. Hutcheson, and Victor M. Moore, Jr.; two other persons were found guilty and filed notices of appeal but have not prosecuted their appeals. Appellants raise various issues, but we have determined that no reversible error was committed. We affirm.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Gori v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Beck v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. United States v. John L. MorrowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. BrightCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Bonifacio De La Fuente, Ronald Albert Cardenas, George Sierra, Pat Vargas,augie D. Sierra, and Robert StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Laurel Joan MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API