Suggs v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtGerber, J.
A jury convicted the defendant of four counts of “written threat to kill or do bodily injury” for sending two letters, each of which threatened the same two persons. *147The defendant argues that his convictions violate the double jeopardy clause.1 More specifically, he argues that the “allowable unit of prosecution” for the charge should be the number of letters or communications sent, and not the number of people to whom each letter or communication is sent.2 We disagree. We hold that the allowable unit of prosecution is the number of persons to whom each letter or communication is sent, and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Bautista v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Grappin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- United States v. Richard GeislerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- O'Leary v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Calamia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Joshua Terrel Brown v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- Suggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011