Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Banks

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1930No. 7327PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. A motion to strike an equitable amendment filed by a claimant in aid of liis statutory claim, being in the nature of a general demurrer, the overruling of such motion can not be made a ground of a motion for a new trial. Leathers v. Leathers, 132 Ga. 211 (2) (63 S. E. 1118); Hawkins v. Studdard, 132 Ga. 265 (63 S. E. 852, 131 Am. St. R. 190); Lee v. McCarty, 132 Ga. 698 (3) (64 S. E. 997); Tompkins v. American Land Co., 139 Ga. 377 (77 S. E. 623).

2. “A ground of the motion for new trial, assigning error upon the overruling by the court of a motion to rule out evidence, which does not set…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Clare v. DrexlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Tompkins v. American Land Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Leathers v. LeathersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Protestant Episcopal Church of Diocese v. Lowe Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McDuffie County v. GunnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Pinckney v. WeilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Home Insurance Co. of New York v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  4. Cherokee Fertilizer Co. v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API