Legal Opinion

Gold v. Calderazzo

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application to compel a purchaser at a judicial sale by a referee in foreclosure to complete his 'purchase.

1Opinion of the CourtManning, J.

This is an application to compel a purchaser at a judicial sale by a referee appointed by a judgment of foreclosure and sale to complete his purchase made at the public auction, where he was the highest bidder and deposited the usual ten per cent of the purchase price. When the deed of the referee was tendered to the purchaser he refused to accept it on the ground that it did not pass a good marketable title to the premises, his only objection being that there was *599an encroachment of half an inch for a distance of about forty feet, consisting of a three-story brick wall of the building on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ungrich v. ShaffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. Merges v. RinglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Merges v. . RinglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Harrison v. PlattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. McDonald v. BachNew York Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Noethinger v. JeffriesNew York Supreme Court · 1919
  2. McGraw v. SelkisNew York Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API