Legal Opinion

Howell v. Louisville & N. R.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 8, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

The appellant brought this suit against the appellee for personal injuries sustained by him when he was run over by an engine of the appellee while he was crossing a trestle of the appellee within the corporate limits of the town of Wallins. At the close of all the evidence, the court peremptorily instructed the jury to find for the appellee, and, from - the judgment on the verdict thus found, this appeal is prosecuted.

The defense of the appellee was three-fold: First, a plea of compromise and settlement; second, a traverse of the alleged grounds…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railway Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. McElroyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  3. Vandervelden v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1894
  4. Bramble v. Cin. F. L. & S. E. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  5. Buford v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hooks v. Cornett Lewis Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  2. Baker's Adm'x v. Louisville N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Hazelwood v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. Public Service Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936
  5. Smallwood v. Kentucky & West Virginia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API