Legal Opinion

Cropper v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided May 13, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00629Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 ANN CROPPER, Case No.: 2:19-cv-00629-JCM-NJK 12 Plaintiff(s), Order 13 v. [Docket Nos. 31, 32] 14 WAL-MART STORES, INC., 15 Defendant(s). 16 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for protective order. Docket No. 31. 17 Plaintiff filed a response in opposition, and Defendant filed a reply. Docket Nos. 34, 35. The 18 motion is properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons discussed 19 below, the motion for protective order is DENIED.1 20 “A party who wants to depose a person by oral…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Great American Insurance v. Vegas Construction Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2008
  3. In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  4. Paul v. Winco Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API