Legal Opinion

Widow Blondin v. Koontz

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1858PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Fifth District Court of New Orleans, Eggleston, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

We have not found in this record either direct proof or circumstances creating a presumption of simulation, in the transfer of defendant’s judgment against Marc Curel to William B. Koontz, by notarial act of the 9th of December, 1854.

*325That transfer was made more than two years before the present plaintiff levied, her execution upon the judgment transfer. The act of transfer was given in evidence without objection or qualification; and the answer of plaintiff to the third opposition of Koontz, did not raise the issue of simulation. The third opponent, was, therefore, dispensed with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Succession of DelassizeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Miami v. Jefferson Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Theriot v. Consolidated Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Milliken & Farwell v. Taft Mercantile Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Montgomery v. BouanchaudSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API