Legal Opinion

Rose v. Osborne

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 16, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.

The plaintiff was appointed by a probate court in this State, to settle the estate of a Maine decedent. As administratrix, she sued defendant, a resident of this jurisdiction, with whom subpoena was personally left in service, alleging that three savings bank deposits, all in defendant’s name, are of moneys which, in her decedent’s lifetime, even unto his death, belonged to him.

The bill sought to impose a constructive trust.

On hearing, the tidal court sustained contention, in part. It found, and decreed, plaintiff entitled to the account in the Androscoggin County Savings Bank.

On appeal by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BurgdoerferSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Thibodeaux v. ThibodeauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  3. Rose v. OsborneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  4. Estate of Silliker v. OsborneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eastside Disposal Co. v. City of Mercer IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  2. JD Loizeaux Lumber Co. v. DavisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Potts v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API