Legal Opinion
Caco Three, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Huntington Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 29, 2004PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge MIRARCHI.
CACO Three, Inc. (CACO) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Adams County that affirmed the decision of the Board of Supervisors of Huntington Township (Board) disapproving a revised preliminary land development plan. We reverse and remand.
The following relevant facts are undisputed. CACO is the owner and developer of a 235-acre tract of land (subject property) located in Huntington Township (Township), Adams County between State Route 94 and State Route 1020. In early 1999, CACO submitted a preliminary land development plan, proposing to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Herr v. Lancaster County Planning CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Goodman v. Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Harrisburg Fore Associates v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Schultheis v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF UPPER BERN TOWNSHIPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Joseph v. North Whitehall Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Penn Street, L.P. v. East Lampeter Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Robal Associates, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Charlestown TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Kohr v. Lower Windsor Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Atherton Development Co. v. Township of FergusonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.