Legal Opinion

McLean v. Boyd

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.

The petitioner is a taxpayer and elector of the city of Bingamton. The defendants are the mayor, president of the common council, councilmen and clerk of said city.

On March 30, 1931, at ten-thirty o’clock a. m., a petition was filed with the city clerk, signed by 5,086 qualified electors of the city, under the “ Optional City Government Law ” (Laws of 1914, chap. 444), asking that there be submitted to a vote the question: “ Shall the City of Binghamton adopt a simplified form of government defined as Plan C.” Section 19 of that law provides: “ The common council shall at its next regular…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Mayor, Etc., of New York (Elm St.)New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Cleveland v. . City of WatertownNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Palmer v. Hickory Grove CemeteryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Matter of Klein v. DaltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Webster v. Town of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Train v. SistiNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hughes v. JenssNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Johnson v. EtkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API