Legal Opinion

State v. Boyd

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 7, 2009No. AC 28992PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, C. J.

The defendant, Reginald L. Boyd, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a firearm in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217 (a) (1) and threatening in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-62. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly failed to instruct the jury on the doctrine of nonexclusive possession with regard to the firearm and (2) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We conclude that the court’s charge…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. FabricatoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. State v. ArenaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  2. State v. HollowayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. State v. WeavingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. State v. BrodiaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. State v. BoydSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API