Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Unit Drilling
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 12, 2002No. 95,999PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WATT, Vice Chief Justice.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
T1 In 1998 the Workers' Compensation Court, Hon. Terry Pendell, entered an order finding that Petitioner, Gary Armstrong, had sustained an accidental personal injury to his chest and had suffered a heart attack. The court held that Armstrong was totally and permanently disabled as a result of his injury and ordered,
THAT respondent and insurance carrier shall pay all reasonable medical expenses incurred by claimant as a result of said injury.
Respondents, Unit Drilling and Liberty Mutual, appealed the trial court's ruling to a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bill Hodges Truck Co. v. GillumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Orrick Stone Company v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Schlumberger v. DrummondCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blythe v. University of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Emery v. Central Oklahoma Health CareSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- LOYD v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Hall v. Sheffield Steel Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Armstrong v. Unit DrillingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.