Legal Opinion

Stotsenburg v. Frost

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1975No. 138 and 169Published

1Opinion of the Court

465 Pa. 187 (1975)

348 A.2d 418

Ralph M. STOTSENBURG

v.

Richard H. FROST, Individually and as liquidator of Ralph M. Stotsenburg and Richard H. Frost, late trading as Autotrols, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

October 30, 1975.

Rehearing Denied December 30, 1975.

Thomas P. Geer, Pittsburgh, for appellant.

R. Alan Stotsenburg, New York City, for appellee.

Before EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX, and MANDERINO, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

O'BRIEN, Justice.

These appeals arise from a final decree in equity affirmed by the court en banc, entered on March 25, 1974. This decree…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Hartford Sterling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Sanders AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Stotsenburg v. FrostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Gyger's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  5. Tax Review Board v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API