Legal Opinion

Mullins v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided April 5, 1991No. 1705-89-3PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLEMAN, J.

In a bench trial on December 4, 1984, the circuit court convicted Jessie James Mullins for violating Code § 18.2-248 by distributing hydromorphone (dilaudid), a Schedule II controlled substance. Mullins contends that the certificate of drug analysis was admitted into evidence in violation of Code § 19.2-187.1 We agree. Accordingly, we reverse his conviction and remand the case.

Mullins further contends that the trial court erred by permitting a deputy clerk to testify, in violation of Code § 19.2-271, that defense counsel had looked at the court file prior to trial.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gray v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  2. Stokes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Myrick v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  2. Woodward v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  3. Cregger v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  4. Bottoms v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  5. Coleman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API