Legal Opinion

State v. Kaba

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 3, 2002No. 1999-113-C.APublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAMS, Chief Justice.

The defendants, Sory Kaba (Kaba) and Kankoumady Traore (Traore) (collectively referred to as defendants), appeal their three-count convictions, which include charges of possession and conspiracy to *386possess heroin with the intent to deliver, after a Superior Court jury trial. The defendants argue that the trial justice committed a variety of errors during the trial.1 We disagree and affirm the judgment of the Superior Court. The facts pertinent to this appeal are as follows.

I

Facts and Travel

This case concerns the delivery of a package from Thailand, addressed to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. AndreasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. CaruoloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  4. State v. BanachSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  5. State v. MariniSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. GrayhurstSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  2. Easlick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. State v. CiprianoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  4. State v. VargasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  5. State v. KittellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API