Anderson v. Consolidated School District No. 144
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
Action for breach of contract of hire. After verdict for plaintiff, defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.
Plaintiff is a primary school teacher. Under the contract in question she was employed by defendant for the term from September 4, 1933, to June 1, 1934. Her personal and professional qualifications are conceded to be of the best. The one trouble is that she has been the unfortunate victim of three fainting spells, epileptiform in nature. The first occurred June 3, 1933; the second October 2; and the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- School Dist. No. 94, Grant Co. v. GautierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Backie v. Cromwell Consolidated School District No. 13Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Finch v. Fractional School District No. 1 of Vassar & No. 2 of TuscolaMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Morris v. School District No. 40Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Meade County Board of Education v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Kroll v. Independent School District No. 593Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Seher v. Woodlawn School District No. 26North Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Klimek v. School District No. 70Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.