Finch v. Fractional School District No. 1 of Vassar & No. 2 of Tuscola
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
Plaintiff was hired as superintendent of schools of the defendant school district. A provision of the written contract signed by the parties, here material, is that if plaintiff shall be dismissed from the school by the board of trustees for gross immorality he shall not be entitled to any compensation from and after such dismissal. The board had before it charges of gross immorality against the plaintiff, in substance, • that plaintiff had frequently taken the name of God in vain and had used, habitually, profane language in the presence and hearing of his pupils. The board appointed a time…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wieman v. MabeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- McCrea v. Pine Tp. School Dist., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1891
- Derry v. Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Milligan v. Sligh Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- School District v. MaurySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rehberg v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF MELVINDALE, ECORSE SCH. DIST. NO. 11Michigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Coggins Ex Rel. Coggins v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Seher v. Woodlawn School District No. 26North Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Baird v. School District No. 25Wyoming Supreme Court · 1930
- State Ex Rel. Howard v. IrelandMontana Supreme Court · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.