Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Oregon County v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1853PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Oregon Circuit Court. Tbe bond is good although not executed to tbe county, as required by statute. United States v. Tingey, 5 Peters, 115. Grant & Finney v. Brotherton’s administrator, .7 Mo. Rep. 460. Gathwright v. Callaway County, 10 Mo. Rep. 666.

1Opinion of the Court

RyXiAND, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

This was a civil action on a bond executed by Thomas, as treasurer of Oregon county, and by the other defendants in error as bis securities. The bond was executed to the .State of Missouri. The defendants in error demurred to the petition because the bond was not executed to Oregon county, as required by the statute, and also because the assignment of the breaches was not sufficient. The court below sustained the demurrer, and gave judgment thereon for the defendants. The case is brought to this court by writ of error. The following is a copy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. TingeySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Grant v. Brotherton's Administrator ex rel. JanneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1842

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. La Crosse Lumber Co. v. SchwartzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. State ex rel. Lafayette County v. O'GormanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  3. State ex rel. West v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  4. Wiss v. Royal Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. State Ex Rel. Kenney v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API