Legal Opinion

Wiss v. Royal Indemnity Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff below against the defendant, Royal Indemnity Company, as surety on a contractor’s bond for hay, oats and salt sold and delivered to a subcontractor as feed for his horses and mules used in the work of grading and hauling materials in the construction of a road. A judgment resulted for plaintiff and the defendant appeals.

The sole assignment of error is that since it is conceded that the account sued on was solely for hay, oats and salt that was sold and delivered to subcontractors which was used by them in feeding the horses and mules used by them on the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. City of St. Louis ex rel. Glencoe Lime & Cement Co. v. Von PhulSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  5. Kansas City ex rel. Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Co. v. YoumansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. School District of Springfield R-12 Ex Rel. Midland Paving Co. v. Transamerica Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Robson v. United Pacific Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. Public Water Supply District No. 8 of Jefferson County v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. Lincoln County v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. State Ex Rel. Penn Lubric Oil Co. v. LyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API