Legal Opinion
Pence v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1965No. L. A. 28323PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
The question presented in this proceeding is whether petitioner Pence was unduly restricted in the production of rebuttal testimony at the hearing held to challenge the recommendations of the commission’s rating expert. We are of the opinion that Pence was so restricted. For that reason the award must be annulled and the matter remanded to the commission for further proceedings.
On August 15, 1963, Pence, while working as a cement finisher in Pasadena for Del E. Webb Corporation, suffered an industrial injury that caused him to leave his work. At that time he was 64 years old. The commission,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allied Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Walker Mining Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Caesar's Restaurant v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Columbia - Geneva Steel Division v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hegglin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- The Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Gaiera v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Morgan v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Aliano v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.