Legal Opinion

The Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1967No. Civ. 31389PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOY, J. pro tem. *

This petition seeks review and annulment of an award of workmen’s compensation benefits to Hugo W. Ratzel for permanent disability rated at 14% percent.

Petitioner, the compensation insurance carrier, contends that the referee included in his instructions to the Permanent Disability Rating Bureau a factor of disability which has no support in the evidence and, therefore, the rating of the percentage of disability as recommended by the rating expert at 14½ percent is inappropriate. The appeals board, conceding at the oral argument that the record contains no support for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Allied Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hines v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hegglin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. U.S. Auto Stores v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Luchini v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Franklin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Gaiera v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API