The Fid. & Cas. Co. of N.Y. v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Bd.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCOY, J. pro tem. *
This petition seeks review and annulment of an award of workmen’s compensation benefits to Hugo W. Ratzel for permanent disability rated at 14% percent.
Petitioner, the compensation insurance carrier, contends that the referee included in his instructions to the Permanent Disability Rating Bureau a factor of disability which has no support in the evidence and, therefore, the rating of the percentage of disability as recommended by the rating expert at 14½ percent is inappropriate. The appeals board, conceding at the oral argument that the record contains no support for the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Allied Compensation Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Hines v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Ford Motor Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- County of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hegglin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- U.S. Auto Stores v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Luchini v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Franklin v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Gaiera v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.