Legal Opinion

Tagart v. Indiana

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1851PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from Jefferson Circuit court. The appellant, in this court relies on the statute of limitations: 1. It is insisted, that as to Slone, the statute of limitations commenced running on the 5th of April 3838, and the statute became a defence after the 5th of April 1848, more than two years before suit was instituted in the county court of Jefferson county. 2. The payment of interest, by the principal in Ihe note, does not effect the rights of the security to plead the…

Read the full summary

APPEAL from Jefferson Circuit court. The appellant, in this court relies on the statute of limitations: 1. It is insisted, that as to Slone, the statute of limitations commenced running on the 5th of April 3838, and the statute became a defence after the 5th of April 1848, more than two years before suit was instituted in the county court of Jefferson county. 2. The payment of interest, by the principal in Ihe note, does not effect the rights of the security to plead the statute after the expiration often years. 3. Slone left Indiana without fraud or concealment, and with notice to the agent…

1Opinion of the Court

Rylan», J.,

delivered the opinio»: of the court.

This was an action upon a penal bond for six hundred’ dollars, in favor of the State of Indiana, conditioned for the payment of three hundred dollars on the 6th of April 1838, by William Dixen, Peter Johnson and John Slone. Dixen appears to be principal and Johnson and Slone securities.

The bond was exhibited for allowance on the 19th day of September 1849, and was allowed against Slone’s estate at the September term 1850, of the Jefferson county court. An appeal was taken to the circuit court, where judgment was again given against the estate,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pearsall v. DwightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
  2. Andrews v. HerriotNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  3. Dwight v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
  4. Hall v. LittleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1817
  5. Byrne v. CrowninshieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Merchants & Planters National Bank of Sherman v. AppleyardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Thomas v. BlackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  3. First National Bank v. HendrieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  4. St. Joseph & Grand Island Railway Co. v. Elwood Grain Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  5. Scroggs v. DaughertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API